| Peter Alexander - 1985 - 362 páginas
...intimate some particular action of its own, at that time, relating to those Ideas. This it does in several ways; as, Is, and Is not, are the general marks of the Mind, affirming or denying. But besides affirmation, or negation, without which, there is in Words no Truth or Falsehood, the Mind... | |
| Michael Ayers - 1993 - 708 páginas
...'intimations' linking either ideas or whole affirmations. Here he agreed with contemporary logics that 'Is and Is not are the general marks of the Mind, affirming or denying'," while he explained the word 'but' (moving from the second to the third part of logic) as one of those... | |
| Michael Morris - 2006 - 8 páginas
...intimate some particular action of its own, at that time, relating to those ideas. This it does several ways; as, Is, and Is not, are the general marks of the mind, affirming or denying. 12 The suggestion seems to be this. If I say, 'Socrates is waspish', then I am affirming waspishness... | |
| Lex Newman - 2007 - 18 páginas
...proposition could be. 12 See also E Il.xxxii.i, 19: 384, 391; and E IILvii.i: 471, where Locke says "Is, and Is not, are the general marks of the Mind, affirming, or denying." Mind, perceiving, or judging of their Agreement, or Disagreement." I have suggested that the most natural... | |
| Hannah Dawson - 2007 - 295 páginas
...calls them, 'intimate some particular action' of the mind. He gives the familiar example of the copula: 'Is, and Is not are the general marks of the mind, affirming or denying.'5 He seems to be singing an old tune. Language effects 'the communication of thoughts', without... | |
| |