TABLE OF CASES OVERRULED, ETC.

Adams v. Mackenzie (1863), 13 C. B. (N. S.) 446; discussed, SAILING SHIP BLAIRMORE v. MACREDIE (1898), A. C. at p. 598. Alps, The (1893), P. 109; followed and approved, THE Bedouin (1894), P. 1, C. A.

Anderson v. Morice (1876), 1 App. Cas. 713; distinguished, COLONIAL Ins. Co. OF NEw Zealand v. Adelaide Mar. Ins. Co. (1886), 12 App. Cas. at p. 135.

Assemrazioni Generali v. SS. Bessie Morris (1892), 1 Q. B. 571; affirmed, (1892) 2 Q. B. 652, C. A.

Atwood v. Sellar (1880), 5 Q. B. D. 286, C. A.; discussed, SVENSDEN v. WALLACE (1885), 10 App. Cas. 404.

Barber v. Fleming (1870), L. R. 5 Q. B. 59; followed, FOLEY v.

UNITED FIRE AND MAR. Ins. Co. (1870), L. R. 5 C. P. 155. Barker v. Janson (1868), L. R. 3 C. P. 303; discussed, LIDGETT v. SECRETAN (1871), L. R. 6 C. P. at p. 628.

Beatson v. Haworth (1786), 6 T. R. 531; explained, MARSDEN v.

REID (1803), 4 East, at p. 577.

Blackburn v. Vigors (1887), 12 App. Cas. 531; considered, BLACKBURN v. HASLAM (1888), 21 Q. B. D. 144.

Blackett v. Royal Exchange (1832), 2 C. & J. 244; distinguished, STEWART v. MERCHANTS' MAR. INS. Co. (1885), 16 Q. B. D. 619, C. A.

Booth v. Gair (1864), 33 L. J. C. P. 99; explained, KIDSTON v. EMPIRE INS. Co. (1866), L. R. 1 C. P. at p. 549.

Conway v. Gray (1809), 10 East, 547; disapproved, AUBERT v. GRAY (1861), 3 B. & S. 163.

Cory v. Patton (1872), L. R. 7 Q. B. 304; followed, LISHMAN v. NORTHERN MAR. Ins. Co. (1875), L. R. 10 C. P. 179, Ex. Ch. Cullen v. Butler (1816), 5 M. & S. 461; approved, THAMES AND MERSEY MAR. INS. Co. v. HAMILTON (1884), 12 App. Cas. at p. 501.

xxiv TABLE OF CASES OVERRULED, ETC.

De Mattos v. North (1868), L. R. 3 Ex. 185; followed, BERRIDGE V • MAN ON INS. Co. (1887), 18 Q. B. D. 346, C. A.

Devaux v. l'Anson (1839), 5 Bing. N. C. 519, 540; criticised, THAMES AND MERSEY MAR. INS. Co. v. HAMILTON (1884), 12 App. Cas. at p. 496, H. L.

Dickinson v. Jardine (1868), L. R. 3 C. P. 639; discussed, THE MARY THOMAS (1894), P. at pp. 114, 118; THE KNIGHT OF ST. MICHAEL (1898), P. at p. 34.

Dixon v. Whitworth (1879), 4 C. P. D. 371; reversed, DIXON v. WHITWORTH (1880), 4 Asp. Mar. Cas. 327, C. A., and W. N. 1880, p. 43.

Eglinton v. Norman (1877), 3 Asp. Mar. Cas. 471; overruled, ARROW SHIPPING Co. v. TYNE COMMISSIONERS (1894), A. C. 508, H. L. Farnworth v. Hyde (1865), 18 C. B. (N. S.) 835; reversed on one point, FARNWORTH V. HYDE (1866), L. R. 2 C. P. 204, Ex. Ch.; see at p. 226.

Farnworth v. Hyde (1866), L. R. 2 C. P. 204, Ex. Ch.; criticised, MCARTHUR, Ed. 2, p. 151; LoWNDES, Ed. 2, p. 137.

Fawcus v. Sarsfield (1856), 6 E. & B. 192; followed, DUDGEON v. PEMBROKE (1877), 2 App. Cas. 284.

Fitzherbert v. Mather (1785), 1 T. R. 12; commented on, BLACKBURN v. VIGORS (1887), 12 App. Cas. 531.

Garston Sailing Ship v. Hickie (1885), 15 Q. B. D. 580; discussed, HUNTER V. NORTHERN MAR. INS. Co. (1888), 13 App. Cas. 717.

Gibson v. Small (1852), 4 H. L. C. 353; distinguished, COUCH v. STEEL (1854), 3 E. & B. at pp. 407, 408; followed, DUDGEON v. PEMBROKE (1877), 2 App. Cas. 284.

Gladstone v. King (1813), 1 M. & S. 35; disapproved, BLACKBURN v. VIGORS (1887), 12 App. Cas. at pp. 530, 540.

Great Indian Peninsular Ry. Co. v. Saunders (1861), 1 B. & S. 41; 2 B. & S. 266; explained, KIDSTON v. EMPIRE INs. Co. (1866), L. R. 1 C. P. at p. 548.

Hagedorn v. Oliverson (1814), 2 M. & S. 485; followed, CORY v. PATTON (1874), L. R. 9 Q. B. 577, Ex. Ch.

Hamilton v. Mendes (1761), 2 Burr. 1198; discussed, RUYS v. ROYAL EXCHANGE (1897), 2 Q. B. at p. 138.

Havelock v. Hancill (1789), 3 T. R. 277; discussed, CRAWLEY v. BURR (1883), 8 App. Cas. at p. 399..

Hicks v. Shield (1857), 7 E. & B. 633; discussed, ALLISON v. BRISTOL MAR. INS. Co. (1876), 1 App. Cas. at p. 221.

Holdsworth v. Wise (1828), 7 B. & C. 794; discussed, SAILING SHIP BLAIRMORE v. MACREDIE (1898), A. C. at p. 609.

Hurst v. Usborne (1856), 18 C. B. 144; doubted, RANKIN v. POTTER (1873), L. R. 6 H. L. at p. 117.

Hydarnes Steamship Co. v. Indemnity Mutual Mar. Ins. (1894), 2 Q. B. 500; reversed, (1895) 1 Q. B. 500, C. A.

Jackson v. Union Mar. Ins. Co. (1874), L. R. 10 C. P. 125; distinguished, INMAN STEAMSHIP Co. v. BISHOFF (1882), 7 App. Cas. at p. 676; followed, Re JAMIESON (1895), 1 Q. B. at p. 95, C. A.

Kirchner v. Venus (1859), 12 Moore P. C. 361; explained, ALLISON v. BRISTOL MAR. Ins. Co. (1876), 1 App. Cas. 209, at p. 224. Kleinwort v. Shepard (1859), 1 E. & E. 447; discussed, CRAWLEY v. BURR (1883), 8 App. Cas. at p. 396.

Knight v. Faith (1850), 15 Q. B. 649; criticised, RANKIN v. POTTER (1873), L. R. 6 H. L. at pp. 102, 130; TRINDER v. THAMES AND MERSEY INS. Co. (1898), 2 Q. B. at p. 119, C. A.

Laveroni v. Drury (1853), 22 L. J. Ex. 2; discussed, HAMILTON v. PANDORF (1887), 12 App. Cas. at p. 523.

Law v. Hollingsworth (1797), disapproved, DIXON v. SADLER (1839), 5 M. & W. at p. 408; disapproved with a qualification, SADLER v. Dixon (1841), 8 M. & W. at p. 900, Ex. Ch.

Le Cheminant v. Pearson (1812), 4 Taunt. 367, 380; discussed, AITCHISON V. LOHRE (1879), 4 App. Cas. at p. 763.

Livie v. Janson (1812), 12 East, 647; explained, IONIDES v. UNIVERSAL MAR. INS. Co. (1863), 14 C. B. (N. S.) at p. 294; LIDGETT v. SECRETAN (1871), L. R. 6 C. P. at p. 625.

Lohre v. Aitchison (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 558, C. A. ; reversed, AITCHISON v. LOHRE (1879), 4 App. Cas. 755.

Mason v. Sainsbury (1748), 1 Ves. Sen. 98; explained, SIMPSON v. THOMPSON (1877), 3 App. Cas. at p. 293.

Moss v. Smith (1850), 9 C. B. 94; approved, AITCHISON v. LOHRE (1879), 4 App. Cas. at p. 762.

North Britain, The (1894), P. 77; approved, TATHAM v. Burr (1898), A. C. 382, H. L.

North of England Ins. Assn. v. Armstrong (1870), L. R. 5 Q. B. 244; doubted, BURNAND v. RODOCANACHI (1882), 7 App. Cas. at

p. 342. Parmeter v. Todhunter (1808), 1 Camp. 541; disapproved, CURRIE v. BOMBAY NATIVE Ins. Co. (1869), L. R. 3 P. C. at p. 78. Pipon v. Cope (1808), 1 Camp. 434; explained, TRINDER v. THAMES AND MERSEY MAR. Ins. Co. (1898), 2 Q. B. at p. 129, C. A. Pitman v. Universal Mar. Ins. Co. (1882), 9 Q. B. D. 192, C. A.; discussed, MARINE INS. Co. v. CHINA STEAMSHIP Co. (1886), 11 App. Cas. at p. 590.