The Behavioral Origins of WarUniversity of Michigan Press, 2009 M04 9 - 280 páginas In The Behavioral Origins of War, D. Scott Bennett and Allan C. Stam analyze systemic, binary, and individual factors in order to evaluate a wide variety of theories about the origins of war. Challenging the view that theories of war are nothing more than competing explanations for observed behavior, this expansive study incorporates variables from multiple theories and thus accounts for war's multiplicity of causes. While individual theories offer partial explanations for international conflict, only a valid set of theories can provide a complete explanation. Bennett and Stam's unconventional yet methodical approach opens the way for cumulative scientific progress in international relations. D. Scott Bennett is Professor of Political Science at the Pennsylvania State University. Allan C. Stam is Associate Professor in the Government Department at Dartmouth College. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 86
Página x
... dyadic, and monadic levels of analysis, ranging from hegemonic stability the- ory to expected utility theory to the democratic peace proposition. We include key variables from these popular theories of conflict in a multi- nomial logit ...
... dyadic, and monadic levels of analysis, ranging from hegemonic stability the- ory to expected utility theory to the democratic peace proposition. We include key variables from these popular theories of conflict in a multi- nomial logit ...
Página 12
... Dyadic Level of Analysis 3. Alliance and Defense Pact Membership 4. Arms Races 5. Balance of Power 6. Democratic Peace 7. Expected Utility 8. Geographic Contiguity 9. Nuclear Deterrence 10. Power Transition II . Rational Deterrence 12 ...
... Dyadic Level of Analysis 3. Alliance and Defense Pact Membership 4. Arms Races 5. Balance of Power 6. Democratic Peace 7. Expected Utility 8. Geographic Contiguity 9. Nuclear Deterrence 10. Power Transition II . Rational Deterrence 12 ...
Página 14
... make successful predictions about the relative likeli- hood of interstate conflict at both the dyadic and system levels. 2 COMPARATIVE HYPOTHESIS TESTING AND SOME LIMITS TO KNOWLEDGE it 14. WAR. the behavioral origins of.
... make successful predictions about the relative likeli- hood of interstate conflict at both the dyadic and system levels. 2 COMPARATIVE HYPOTHESIS TESTING AND SOME LIMITS TO KNOWLEDGE it 14. WAR. the behavioral origins of.
Página 17
... dyadic factors, or that both play an important role, perhaps under different circumstances that can be specified ex ante. However, we cannot judge the relative risks asso- ciated with each of these perspectives by focusing on one ...
... dyadic factors, or that both play an important role, perhaps under different circumstances that can be specified ex ante. However, we cannot judge the relative risks asso- ciated with each of these perspectives by focusing on one ...
Página 18
... dyadic data set (data that tracks dyads across both space and time) where i and j represent different states (and so ij represents a particular directed dyad) and t represents time (ijt is the dyad ij at time t), our regression equation ...
... dyadic data set (data that tracks dyads across both space and time) where i and j represent different states (and so ij represents a particular directed dyad) and t represents time (ijt is the dyad ij at time t), our regression equation ...
Contenido
15 | |
The Practice and Pitfalls of Comparative Hypothesis Testing | 35 |
4 Arguments and Operational Measures | 70 |
5 Findings | 107 |
6 Assessing a Models Reliability across Space and Time | 165 |
7 Conclusion | 200 |
EUGene | 223 |
Appendix B Measuring Expected Utility | 232 |
Notes | 249 |
Bibliography | 257 |
Index | 277 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
alliance approach argue arguments arms races balance of power baseline Bueno de Mesquita capabilities causal compute conflict behavior conflict initiation conjectures contiguity correlate data set decision defense pacts democracy democratic peace dependent variable Deterrence directed dyad directed dyad-year dispute initiation disputes that escalate dyadic Dyads No Dispute empirical equilibrium predictions estimate EUGene expected utility theory explanations factors fixed-effects game theoretic game tree hypotheses increase initiation and escalation interaction international conflict international politics international system interstate leaders Lemke levels of analysis logic logit measures Mesquita and Lalman military multinomial logit multiple NATO nondirected nuclear weapons Oneal outcomes percent periods Politically Relevant Dyads Polity Change potential power transition Prob problem rational choice theory Reciprocated Force region relative risk risk of conflict risk of disputes risk ratios Russett scores Stam suggest system power concentration target theoretical tion tional trade dependence Unilateral Force values versus