 | South Carolina. Constitutional Court of Appeals, David James McCord - 1830 - 612 páginas
...mill in the yeac 1823, than it was in the year 1807, when the defendant purchased. The defendant moved for a new trial, on the grounds, 1. That the verdict was not supported by the evidence. 2. That the defendant had a prescriptive right to raise the waters of... | |
 | Scotland. Court of Session - 1832 - 952 páginas
...T. • why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted on the IIarP*rgrounds : — 1. That the verdict was contrary to evidence ; and, 2. That the document offered by the defender in evidence was erroneously rejected. In regard to this latter ground,... | |
 | Thomas Webster - 1844 - 1114 páginas
...jnvenf.jon was no(; the subject-matter of letters patent, and that the specification was insufficient ; and for a new trial, on the grounds — 1. That the verdict was against evidence. 2. Misdirection. 3. The existence of a patent of prior date by about two months,... | |
 | Thomas Webster - 1844 - 796 páginas
...invention was not the subject-matter of letters patent, and that the specification was insufficient ; and for a new trial, on the grounds — 1. That the verdict was against evidence. 2. Misdirection. 3. The existence of a patent of prior date by about two months,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1876 - 738 páginas
...Hastings, Britton & Co. September 27, 1872, and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $2,385.98. Campbell moved for a new trial on the grounds : 1. That the verdict was contrary to law and evidence. 2. That the court erred in permitting the plaintiffs to introduce incompetent evidence.... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1851 - 860 páginas
...verdict. At the October term, 1847, the cause was again tried, and verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs moved for a new trial, on the grounds : 1. That the verdict was contrary to, and against the evidence. 2. The court erred in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by the plaintiffs,... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1882 - 874 páginas
...payment and upon the trial of the case the jury found a verdict in his favor. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial on the grounds : 1. That the verdict was contrary to law. 2. That it is contrary to the charge of the court. 3. Contrary to and without evidence to support... | |
 | South Carolina. Court of Appeals, J. S. G. Richardson - 1854 - 588 páginas
...at the place of delivery. "The jury found $100 damages." The defendants appealed, and now moved this Court for a new trial, on the grounds: 1. That the verdict is founded on a supposed right of the consignee to abandon his goods, if any delay occurs in the delivery... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1861 - 822 páginas
...consideration of the note sued on irt said ease. The .presiding Judge sustained the motion and swarded a new trial on the grounds : 1. That the verdict was contrary to. and without evidence to support it; and also contrary to the .charge of the . Court. T-0 this decision... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court, William Johnson - 1867 - 510 páginas
...the judge. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, which the defendant now moved to set aside, for a new trial, on the grounds, 1 . That the verdict was contrary to evidence ; and, 2. That the judge had rejected proper testimony. * Oakley, for the defendant, contended, that the defendant, having... | |
| |
After the verdict was rendered and before sentence the defendant moved for a new trial on the grounds (1) that the verdict was contrary to... 
