 | John Joseph Powell - 1822 - 648 páginas
...against the person from whom he ifriveJ and, having been tendered bis money, afterwards procures a title. The litigating parties are exempted from the...if no such title existed ; otherwise suits would be indeterminable, or, which would be the same in ett'ect, it would be in the plcasnre of one party, at... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery - 1827 - 704 páginas
...the pendency of the suit, is bound by the decree, that may be made against the person, from whom he derives title. The litigating parties are exempted...if no such title existed. Otherwise, suits would be indeterminable : or, which would be the same in effect, it would be in the pleasure of one party, at... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1846 - 1104 páginas
...pendency of the suit, is bound by the decree that may be made against the person from whom he derives the title. The litigating parties are exempted from the...same in effect, it would be in the pleasure of one party at what period the suit should be determined. The rule may sometimes operate with hardship. but... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1853 - 926 páginas
...the person from whom he derives title. The litigating parties are exempt from the necessity of taking notice of a title so acquired. As to them, it is as...same in effect, it would be in the pleasure of one party at what period the suit should be terminated. The rule may sometimes operate with hardship, but... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1849 - 814 páginas
...during the pendency of the suit, is bound by the decree that may be made against the person from whom he derives title ; the litigating parties are exempted...if no such title existed. Otherwise suits would be indeterminable, or, which would be the same in effect, it would be iu the pleasure of one party at... | |
 | 1852 - 794 páginas
...during the pendency of the suit is bound by the decree that may be made against the person from whom he derives title. The litigating parties are exempted...same in effect, it would be in the pleasure of one party at what period the suit should be determined." And again he observes : — " Lord Alvanley's... | |
 | 1857 - 610 páginas
...the assignee who stands in his place will have the benefit of it. Cleveland a. Boerum. from whom he derives title ; the litigating parties are exempted...same in effect, it would be in the pleasure of one party at what period the suit should be determined. The rule may sometimes operate with hardship, but... | |
 | Austin Abbott - 1857 - 602 páginas
...mortgagor, the utignee who stands in bin place will have the benefit of it Cleveland a. Boerum. from whom he derives title; the litigating parties are exempted...from the necessity of taking any notice of a title soacquired, as to them it is as if no such title existed, otherwise suits would be interminable, or,... | |
 | John Cross - 1859 - 522 páginas
...is, a purchaser, during such pendency, is bound by all decrees made against the person from whom he derives title. The litigating parties are exempted...from the necessity of taking any notice of a title so derived ; for it is, as to them, as if it had not been acquired at all. Suits would otherwise be interminable,... | |
 | Louis Arthur Goodeve - 1870 - 982 páginas
...decision to which I have referred) : " The litigating " parties are exempted from the necessity of taking notice of a " title so acquired. As to them, it is as if no such title existed." I come now to the enquiry, is the alienation which is effected by the force of the vesting order of... | |
| |
But he, who purchases during the pendency of the suit, is bound by the decree, that may be made against the person, from whom he derives title. The litigating parties are exempted from the necessity of taking any notice of a title, so acquired. As to... 
