Strategic Rivalries in World Politics: Position, Space and Conflict Escalation

Portada
Cambridge University Press, 2008 M01 10
International conflict is neither random nor inexplicable. It is highly structured by antagonisms between a relatively small set of states that regard each other as rivals. Examining the 173 strategic rivalries in operation throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, this book identifies the differences rivalries make in the probability of conflict escalation and analyzes how they interact with serial crises, arms races, alliances and capability advantages. The authors distinguish between rivalries concerning territorial disagreement (space) and rivalries concerning status and influence (position) and show how each leads to markedly different patterns of conflict escalation. They argue that rivals are more likely to engage in international conflict with their antagonists than non-rival pairs of states and conclude with an assessment of whether we can expect democratic peace, economic development and economic interdependence to constrain rivalry-induced conflict.
 

Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario

No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.

Contenido

Sección 1
21
Sección 2
39
Sección 3
45
Sección 4
49
Sección 5
73
Sección 6
101
Sección 7
132
Sección 8
161
Sección 9
189
Sección 10
219
Sección 11
240
Sección 12
275

Otras ediciones - Ver todas

Términos y frases comunes

Acerca del autor (2008)

Michael P. Colaresi is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at Michigan State University.

Karen Rasler is Professor in the Department of Political Science at Indiana University.

William R. Thompson is Rogers Professor of Political Science in the Department of Political Science at Indiana University.

Información bibliográfica