...its exiftence any where elfe. Not but the fame, if we confider, is equally true of the Pajl. For tho' it may have once had another kind of being, when (according to common Phrafe) it aftually was, yet was it then fomething Prefent, and not fomething Pajl. As Pajt y it has...

...nothing but anticipation and memory. ' There is nothing,' he says, ' which appears so clearly an object of the mind or intellect only, as the future does,...same, if we consider, is equally true of the past'.' Here we see, that both the future and the past are said to be objects of the intellect only. But the...

...its exiftence any where elfe. Not but the fame, if we confider, is equally true of the Pajl. For tho' it may have once had another kind of being, when (according to common Phrafe) it atlually was, yet was it then fomething Prefent, and not fomething Pajl. As Pafl, it has...

...it loud, you plockit." . . _ ' Dominick read aloud— " There is nothing appears so dearly an object of the mind or intellect only as the future does, since we can find no place for it's existence any where else! not but ,the same, if we consider, is equally true of the past .." "...

..."Then reat it loud, you plockit." Dominick read aloud "There is nothing appears .10 clearly an object of the mind, or intellect, only, as the future does:...same, if we consider, is equally true of the past ." " Well, со on— what stops the plockit? Can't you reat Enclish now ?'* — -"Yee, Sir; but I...

...quodammodo Divinationem. Corn. Nep. in Vit. Attici. t There is nothing appears so clearly an object of the MIND or INTELLECT only, as the Future does,...consider, is equally true of the Past. For though it may hare once had another kind of being, when (according to common Phrase) it actually was, yet was it...

...it aloud, you plockit.'' Dominick readjfaloud — ' There is nothing afificars so clearly an object of the mind or intellect only as the future does,...can find no place for its existence any where else, but not the tame, if we consider is equally true of the past — J 'Well, coon — what slops the plockit...

...appears so clearly an object of the mind or intellect only, as tlie fuiiire does, since we can 6nd no place for its existence any where else. Not but...equally true Of the past. For, though it may have once hud another* kind of being, when (according tu common phrase) it actually was, yet was it theilsomo*...

...to all which is predicated of the future tense — that is, that it is an object of intellect only, since we can find no place for its existence any where else — The some, all this, is true of the past also. " For brave and generous ever are the same." Lttsiad....

...real it loud, you plockit." Dominick read aloud — " There is nothing appears so clearly an object of the mind or intellect only as the future does,...same, if we consider, is equally true of the past ." " Well, co on — What stops the plockit ? — Can't you reat Enclish now ?" " Yes, sir ; but I...